tumblr users, overall, have low financial literacy. and like, I get it. it’s not shocking that a majority user base of chronically broke-adjacent people are intimidated by and/or think it’s useless to learn about financial systems. I’m not surprised by this. but I do think it’s really really important to have an understanding of business and financial concepts, even when it’s dense and scary, because it’s fundamental to how the modern world works. this post is inspired by the notes on this post about the idea of bankification and is for an american audience.
Brennan continues the venerable Tolkien tradition of "I lived through some truly awful history and need to Fantasy Worldbuild about it."
Girl who is about to tell you the saddest fucking thing you've ever heard in your life: Okay so funny story actually, when I was a kid-
it’s wild how tech literacy lasted like one generation barely before it fell off
The tech industry saw to it. In a drive to both expand their market by making it easier to pick up tech without knowing how it works, and in an effort to lock down controllable walled gardens and ecosystems they could fully control and exploit, tech has continuously and systemically destroyed both the need for tech literacy and the avenues for developing it independently.
You are not supposed to know how your devices work. You are not supposed to modify them without paying a service fee, you are not supposed to add functionality to them unless they sell it to you, and you are DEFINITELY not supposed to repair or reuse them when they could make you replace them at full price.
Tech literacy didn't die, it was slowly strangled out of people.
The interesting thing here, historically, is that this arc was followed by a lot of what can be considered tech products.
To pick one at random: cars. These days, peoples ability to self-repair and self-maintain their cars is at an all-time low, despite it being easier to do than ever. (There are a million bald guys in overalls on Youtube who will show you a video describing precisely how to replace a fuel control valve on a 2012 Ford Fiesta.)
The reason for this is that cars got better, and more reliable. For many decades after their introduction, if you owned a car at all, you had to be conversant in their maintenance and repair, because those things broke down or were just straight-up factory lemons in ways that would be unthinkable in a modern automobile. So the populace as a whole became very "car literate," because you had to be.
Then they made them better. (There's a lot of literature on how Toyota specifically revolutionized car quality in the 80s.) And because they were better, you no longer NEEDED to know all those things. It's entirely possible to own a car for decades and never need to field-replace a part because you broke down on the road somewhere, a situation that would have been unthinkable in our grandparents time. (This has had a lot of implications for AAA.)
And so, except among dedicated hobbyists or DIYers, that knowledge is slowly draining out of the populace.
You had other arcs like this with the vast array of mechanized products available to people in the industrialized world with the advent of widespread electrification. Things like refrigerators and vacuum cleaners and TVs were absolute garbage, and if you owned one it was in your best interests to learn how to replace a blown fuse or stripped wire. Then they got better, and that knowledge drained out of the populace. It is true that these things are to some extent deliberately designed to not be field-repairable anymore, but it's also true that your vacuum cleaner is far less likely to blow a fuse, I mean a literal vacuum-tube fuse, and start a fire when you plug it in, something that used to be very common.
When it comes to computers, what we think of as "modern" tech... well, I've been doing this for a long time. If I wanted to install a game in 1995, I had to load into the autoexec.bat and config.sys files and edit my HIMEM settings so that Wing Commander II wouldn't eat itself in a stack overflow on load. It had a whole manual telling me how to do surgery so I could launch the game.
These days I click three buttons in Steam, and that WORKS like 99.9% of the time.
I go back and forth on if this is a bad thing or not. I mean, it's absolutely bad that we aren't ALLOWED to service our own shit if we're so inclined. But, well... we're transitioning from "this tech is new and shiny and the wave of the future" to "this stuff is just stuff. It's stuff we use. Why should I know everything about how it works?"
I rent a house. My house is a technological marvel by any reasonable standard; the plumbing and electrical wiring and HVAC system represent some very complex systems that were installed by experts. I have no idea how to do anything but the most basic maintenance or repair work on them, and I have no idea how ANY of it works. I can reset a breaker from the box in the basement. I can change a lightbulb. I can unclog a toilet or a garbage disposal. But if you asked me how any of the wiring in the walls works or how precisely water pressure is maintained, I wouldn't be able to tell you. I certainly couldn't re-wire anything. Nor tell you how I connect to city gas lines which keep me warm in the winter. If any of that stuff seriously broke, I am completely tech illiterate. I'd call an expert.
Because this stuff isn't tech to me, even though it's absolutely tech by any reasonable definition. It's just stuff. It works. I see no need to understand it beyond that. I am very tech illiterate about my home, as are many people.
That's what "tech" is to the people who didn't live through the information revolution. It's just stuff. It works. Their smartphone is no more remarkable to them than our grandparents rotary phones were to THEM back in the 50s. To those of us who are older, the smartphone is a revolutionary device that changed the world. To those who are younger, it's just... a phone. It does phone things. Why do they need to be literate about it?
whenever youre wasting time on job applications always remember youre ALSO wasting someone else's time. so it's not all bad. going down, hand in unlovable hand, with an anonymous HR manager
You know a little detail I love in The Martian book? That Mark is obviously smart, but to different degrees depending on the subject.
He’s a mechanical engineer and a botanist. This makes him especially good at math, biology, food science, physics, and techy stuff that involves building things or taking stuff apart and making it do something else and general problem solving
He’s also generally good at chemistry. He knows that to make water he can breakdown hydrazine, but doesn’t think about the fact that it would cause the place to fill with hydrogen and almost blow up until it does. He also knows you exhale some oxygen each time you breathe, but doesn’t know how much.
He knows that solar panels are held at a 14 degree angle but doesn’t know why, and only knows the angle because he was in charge of setting them up
When he gets injured he doesn’t say what muscles, just that his back hurts. He fixes most of his muscle injuries with pain killers and warm baths while thinking about how the medic would have more detailed instructions
He has no idea how the pilot is so good at pilot stuff, and never differentiates different kinds of rocks like the geologist would
It’s just cool to have a smart character who is smart at things that make sense for their degrees and experience. So many characters get the Sherlock Holmes treatment where they’re good at whatever the plot needs, but in this case the book uses his blind spots as part of the plot. He knows enough chemistry to solve problems but not enough to anticipate the problems the chemistry would cause as well. It’s refreshing to have a book where what a character is bad at, or just not super good at, works with the story rather than just getting glossed over or having the character magically good at everything because if you know botany obviously you also know anatomy and geology and meteorology, etc
“…knows enough chemistry to solve problems but not enough to anticipate the problems…” is such a good way to put it.
“Each crewman had their own laptop. So I have six at my disposal. Rather, I had six. I now have five. I thought a laptop would be fine outside. It’s just electronics, right? It’ll keep warm enough to operate in the short term, and it doesn’t need air for anything.
It died instantly. The screen went black before I was out of the airlock. Turns out the “L” in “LCD” stands for “Liquid.” I guess it either froze or boiled off. Maybe I’ll post a consumer review. “Brought product to surface of Mars. It stopped working. 0/10.””
with love. you have to fact check shit. yes you. you still have to fact check shit. a lot of people are great at fact checking stuff they don’t want to be true, but somehow are still absolute ass at fact checking stuff that’s rhetorically convenient to them. even people my age, who I KNOW grew up doing internet/bibliography literacy workshops, and being warned not to believe anything that isn’t reliably sourced, people who DO harp on fact checking conservative output or whatever, are still kneejerk sharing unsourced shit that is partially or wholly untrue or misleading, because it suits whatever narrative they’re pursuing in that moment, without even a “take this with a grain of salt”. fact check!!!!!! look at the sources!!!!! yes it’s a drag!!! do it!!!!!
a reminder that "you should probably fact check that" is not an attack on your beliefs. if it's true then you have nothing to lose from fact checking it. and if it's false? you have everything to gain from fact checking it
"You must teach your children that the ground beneath their feet is the ashes of your grandfathers. So that they will respect the land, tell your children that the earth is rich with the lives of our kin. Teach your children what we have taught our children, that the earth is our mother. Whatever befalls the earth befalls the sons of the earth. If men spit upon the ground, they spit upon themselves."
-- Chief Si'ahl (often anglicized as "Seattle")
ADHD time blindness be like "oh, today is the 30th? that's fine, December is still next month, that's forever away!
...what do you mean tommorrow?"
happy 1 year anniversary to this post,
DECEMBER IS TOMMORROW.
AGAIN.
honestly I hate “can you pet the dog?!?” not for any of the common reasons but because it was initially interesting as a proposition of “can you interact with the world in a way that is not within the primary mechanical loop” and that very quickly fell away to being “well now any indie developer making a game has to have a pet the dog button or they’re going to get letters”
One of my dream projects has an NPC with a dog, and if you try to pet it, the owner tells you not to do that. If you try again, it bites you and you take damage. I want to do this entirely because I genuinely believe that this would make me feel way more grounded in the world than any “click button to see cute animation” would ever do, and also it would be really funny to have a game where people lose their runs because they tried to pet a dog they were told not to pet













